I PKN 68/96
KI-generiert
Employer dismissed appeal; burden of proving employee fault for dismissal lies with employer under Labor Code.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding procedural violations but allowed the appeal concerning the substantive dismissal grounds. The plaintiffs sought reinstatement after being fired without notice for causing property damage, while the employer argued the employees were at fault. The court ruled that the employer failed to prove the required level of employee negligence, thus the dismissal was unjustified.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 6 KC; Art. 52 § 1 KP: The employer bears the burden of proving the employee's fault (intent or gross negligence) necessary to justify dismissal without notice under the Labor Code.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
burden of proof
labor code
dismissal without notice
employee fault
gross negligence
property damage
reinstatement
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 6 KC
Art. 52 § 1 KP
Art. 300 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC