Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PRN 5/95 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal despite wrong document title if it contains appeal grounds and request for change.

Geschäftsnummer I PRN 5/95
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court granted extraordinary review to overturn a lower court's dismissal of an appeal due to a procedural error. The plaintiff submitted a document titled 'appeal' to the second instance court, which the lower court mistakenly treated as a request for the judgment's reasoning, thereby delaying the appeal deadline. The Supreme Court ruled that such clerical errors do not invalidate the appeal if the document clearly identifies the challenged judgment, states the grounds, and requests a change, allowing the appeal to proceed as if filed on time.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 371 § 2 k.p.c.: Clerical errors or incorrect document titles do not prevent the commencement of proceedings if the document contains the challenged judgment, grounds for appeal, and a request for its change.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
procedural error incorrect document title appeal commencement extraordinary review clerical mistake judicial discretion statutory interpretation

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 130 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 371 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 367 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 371 § 2 k.p.c
art. 367 k.p.c
art. 371 § 1 k.p.c

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext