Supreme Court remands labor dispute regarding salary increases based on collective agreement interpretation and employee rights.

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review request and remanded the case for retrial due to unresolved factual ambiguities. The plaintiff argued that a collective agreement guaranteed specific salary components, while the defendant claimed statutory changes automatically revoked these rights. The court held that if a benefit stems solely from the parties' will rather than statutory law, a new agreement cannot automatically strip the employee of that right without clarification.