I PZP 46/94 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows 12-month notice clause in indefinite-term contracts as generally more favorable to employees under Art. 18 § 2 of Labor Code.

Geschäftsnummer I PZP 46/94

Gericht / Behörde Sąd Najwyższy

Rechtsordnung

Polen (PL)

Entscheiddatum 1994-11-09

Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a 12-month notice period clause in an indefinite-term employment contract is permissible under Polish law. The plaintiff, a former CEO, sued for reinstatement after the employer terminated her contract without notice, arguing the clause was invalid. The Court ruled that such clauses are admissible because, under Article 18 § 2 of the Labor Code, they are generally more favorable to employees when balancing market conditions against potential inconveniences.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 36 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.; Art. 18 § 2 k.p.: A notice period longer than the statutory minimum in an employment contract is permissible if, upon a global assessment considering market conditions, it is deemed more favorable to the employee.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert

indefinite term contract notice period clause Labor Code Art. 18 employee protection global assessment standard employment termination statutory minimum notice

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert

Art. 36 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.

Art. 18 § 2 k.p.

art. 391 k.p.c

art. 53 § 1 pkt 1 k.p

art. 56 k.p

art. 68 k.p

art. 69 k.p

art. 58 k.p

art. 36 § 1 pkt 3 k.p

art. 18 § 2 k.p

Supreme Court allows 12-month notice clause in indefinite-term contracts as generally more favorable to employees under Art. 18 § 2 of Labor Code.

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

Legislator-Regeste

Schlagwörter

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Volltext