Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
I PRN 21/94 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows extension of statute of limitations for labor dispute due to employee's lack of fault and legal inexperience.

Geschäftsnummer I PRN 21/94
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Polen (PL)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court set aside lower court rulings that dismissed an employee's claim for reinstatement due to a missed filing deadline. The employee argued he was not at fault for missing the 14-day limit because of incorrect legal advice and attempts at out-of-court settlement. The court held that the law does not specify a strict form for requesting a deadline extension and requires a subjective assessment of the employee's knowledge and circumstances, finding the lower courts' rigid approach erroneous.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 k.p.: The absence of fault in missing a short limitation period must be assessed subjectively based on the employee's education and experience, allowing extensions for minor delays caused by legal misinformation or settlement attempts.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
labor dispute statute of limitations missed deadline employee fault reinstatement claim subjective assessment legal inexperience

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 265 k.p.
Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 3 § 2 k.p.c
art. 265 k.p
art. 264 k.p
art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
III PZP 8/86

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext