II PK 311/09
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal regarding union representation requirements for collective bargaining rights.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against her termination during a workforce reduction. The lower courts found that the employee's newly formed union lacked the necessary representativeness under Article 251 of the Trade Unions Act to block her dismissal. The court ruled that the appeal failed to cite specific legal provisions regarding discrimination or procedural errors, rendering the arguments inadmissible.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 251 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; A trade union acting for a single employer must also be representative according to the conditions set forth in Article 251 of the Trade Unions Act to exercise collective bargaining rights.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
trade union representativeness
collective bargaining rights
workforce reduction dismissal
cassation appeal inadmissibility
labor law procedure
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 251 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 38 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 39 k.p
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertII PK 19/05
Retirement eligibility justifies contract termination without constituting age discrimination under Polish labor law.
I PK 210/03
I PK 305/02
I PK 80/03
Supreme Court allows dismissal due to retirement eligibility as socially justified organizational redundancy under Polish Labor Code.
II PK 305/06
Supreme Court quashes labor dispute verdict regarding social fund payments due to lack of evidence authorizing the director's representation.
II PK 138/07
Supreme Court partially quashes labor dismissal verdict regarding union protection scope and social fund benefits.