Employee held liable for entrusted property damage under Art. 124 k.p. despite lack of employer fault.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a lower court judgment ordering him to pay for stolen company property. The employee argued that the employer failed to pursue insurance claims and prematurely accepted liability, yet the court found no grounds to reduce his responsibility. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer's decision to pay damages based on civil law contract terms did not exempt the employee from liability for negligence.