ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:4075
ECLI:NL:RVS:2025:4075
KI-generiert
Court dismisses late review requests as untimely, applying the one-year rule for administrative decisions.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Council of State dismissed the applicants' requests for review of a 2021 administrative decision, ruling them untimely. Although the applicants argued for an extension due to specific circumstances, the court found no grounds to deviate from the standard one-year deadline. Consequently, the application was rejected without substantive examination because it was filed more than a year after the decision's publication.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArticle 8:119 Awb; Article 8:67 Awb: Review requests must be filed within one year of the decision's publication or receipt of new facts, unless exceptional circumstances involving third-party rights justify a shorter period.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
administrative review
untimely application
one year rule
new facts
procedural standing
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArticle 8:119 of the General Administrative Law (Awb)
Article 8:67 of the General Administrative Law (Awb)
artikel 8:67 van de Algemene wet bestuursrecht
artikel 8:119 van de Algemene wet bestuursrecht
Zitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertECLI:NL:RVS:2015:308
Court dismisses late review request as no new facts exist and original judgment stands.
ECLI:NL:RVS:2015:310
Court dismisses late review request as new facts would not have changed the administrative penalty outcome.
ECLI:NL:RVS:2021:939
Court partially allowed appeals against a zoning plan, upholding it against a specific promise claim but striking it for other legal defects.