Court dismisses appeal against CBR's drug education order due to inconsistent defendant testimony and police report reliability.

The Court of Administrative Justice upheld the lower court's decision to confirm the Central Bureau of Driving Licenses' imposition of a drug education measure. The appellant argued that his statement of not being under the influence at the time of driving was valid, but the court found this testimony inconsistent with prior statements and the police report. Consequently, the court ruled that the procedural requirements were met and the appellant bore the risk of any drug use during the stop.