Administrative court upholds planning authority's refusal of accessory dwelling permit based on urban design concerns.

The Council of State confirmed the lower court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal against the refusal of an environmental permit for an accessory dwelling. The appellant argued the authority failed to sufficiently motivate its urban planning objections, claiming no privacy issues existed due to lack of direct sightlines. The court ruled that the authority correctly relied on a professional urban planning advisory opinion to determine that further densification was undesirable in this specific location.