ECLI:NL:RVS:2023:3899
ECLI:NL:RVS:2023:3899
KI-generiert
Administrative appeal dismissed for untimely filing due to lack of proof of service within six weeks.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Council of State declared the administrative appeal inadmissible because it was filed outside the six-week statutory period. The appellant admitted not sending the petition by registered mail and failed to provide alternative proof of timely submission. Consequently, the court ruled that the missed deadline was not excusable and the appeal must be rejected.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArticle 8:67 of the General Administrative Law; An administrative appeal is inadmissible if filed after the six-week deadline unless the delay is excusable, which requires proof of timely service or circumstances attributable to the authority.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
administrative appeal
statutory deadline
registered mail
inadmissible appeal
excusable delay
General Administrative Law
proof of service
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArticle 8:67 of the General Administrative Law