Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 24578/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Cassation court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to improper formulation of legal grounds regarding criminal attempt and subjective elements.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 24578/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal by Rachele Gloria inadmissible and ordered her to pay procedural costs. The appellant argued that the lower court erred in finding no criminal attempt and misidentified the subjective element of the crime. The court rejected these claims because the appeal grounds were not formulated in legally permissible terms for a review on points of law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 360, n. 5 c.p.p.; Art. 360, n. 6 c.p.p.: Appeals on points of law must be formulated in terms permitted by law; appeals seeking a factual reconstruction using criteria different from those adopted by the territorial court are inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
appeal on points of law inadmissibility of appeal formulation of grounds criminal attempt subjective element of crime factual reconstruction procedural requirements Besitzesstörungsklage

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 360, n. 5 c.p.p.
Art. 360, n. 6 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 7698/2022 — snciv
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as evidence evaluation is not a separate legal issue from fact-finding.
Ordinanza — n. 20805/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal claiming lack of witness cross-examination and illogical evidence as inadmissible. The appeal is rejected because the arguments merely repeat those from the appellate court and lack specific factual grounding. The lower court's reasoning was deemed sufficient and logically sound regarding the criminal liability. The appeal is declared inadmissible due to generic formulation and failure to address the specific evidence. The court upholds the first-instance judgment on criminal responsibility. The decision confirms the validity of the evidence-based reasoning used by the territorial court. The appeal fails to meet the threshold for admissibility under Italian procedural law. The court rejects the claim that the witness testimony was decisive for the outcome. The ruling emphasizes the need for precise arguments rather than generic complaints. The decision affirms the finality of the first-instance judgment on the criminal charges.
Ordinanza — n. 23480/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeals against a fine for illegal occupation, citing merit issues and lack of interest.
Sentenza — n. 20807/2025 — snciv
Cassation court dismisses appeal for boundary dispute where lower courts correctly applied legal distance rules and earthquake damage principles.
Sentenza — n. 44058/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to new evidence and circulars not examined by lower court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

posto da: RACHELE GLORIA nato a POLISTENA il 26/11/1979 avverso la sentenza del 24/06/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di PERUGIA dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere MICHELE CALVISI;RITENUTO IN FATTO E

CONSIDERATO IN DIRITTO

Letto il ricorso di Gloria Rachele; considerato che entrambi i motivi di ricorso, con i quali si deduce violazione di legge in relazione alla assunta insussistenza di un tentativo punibile e vizio di motivazione in relazione all'elemento soggettivo del reato contestato, non sono formulati in termini consentiti dalla legge in sede di legittimità (il primo motivo essendo anche reiterativo) perché risultano finalizzati ad ottenere una inammissibile ricostruzione dei fatti mediante criteri di valutazione diversi da quelli adottati dalla Corte territoriale che, con motivazione esente dal vizio dedotto, ha esplicitato congruamente le ragioni del proprio convincimento facendo applicazione di corretti argomenti giuridici ai fini della dichiarazione di responsabilità e della sussistenza del reato; rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile con condanna della ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro