Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 20243/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to withdrawal of the criminal appeal under procedural law.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 20243/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The court declared the cassation appeal filed by Stefano Molon inadmissible because the appellant had formally withdrawn the criminal appeal. The Tribunal of Surveillance in Venice had previously granted the request for a social service placement trial, but Molon's subsequent withdrawal rendered the higher court review impossible under Article 591 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and Molon was ordered to pay procedural costs and a fine for the withdrawal.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 591, comma 1, lett. a) c.p.p.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if the appellant has withdrawn the appeal, thereby depriving the court of jurisdiction to examine the merits of the case.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal appeal withdrawal cassation inadmissibility procedural costs social service placement Code of Criminal Procedure Folgen des Klagerückzugs Einstellung des Betrugsverfahrens Widerruf des Konkurses

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 591, comma 1, lett. a) c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 2498/2026 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of legal grounds for mitigating circumstance.
Ordinanza — n. 2290/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal for lack of specific grounds regarding criminal liability and acquittal requests.
Sentenza — n. 2913/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to formal withdrawal by defense counsel before judgment.
Ordinanza — n. 41360/2025 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility as new exclusion grounds were not raised in lower courts.
Ordinanza — n. 41849/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of effective comparison with first-instance findings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

posto da: MOLON STEFANO nato a ABANO TERME il 26/12/1977 avverso l'ordinanza del 02/04/2025 del TRIB. SORVEGLIANZA di VENEZIA dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere CARMINE RUSSO;Ritenuto in fatto e considerato in diritto Rilevato che Stefano Molon ricorre per cassazione contro il provvedimento indicato in intestazione che ha accolto la sua istanza di affidamento in prova al servizio sociale; Rilevato che è pervenuta rinuncia al ricorso, che lo rende inammissibile ex art. 591, comma 1, lett. a) cod. proc. pen.; Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese del procedimento, nonché al versamento in favore della Cassa delle ammende di una somma contenuta, in via equitativa, a cagione della rinuncia, nella misura indicata in dispositivo; • P.Q.MIl consigliere estensore Il presidente Carmine Russo Vinc p r DEPOSITATA IN CANCL'A.I.AERIA U2026 o Giodìììàfii9 Jy intik 2