Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 18273/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Criminal appeal dismissed for being filed personally by the appellant, resulting in a fine.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 18273/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed personally by the appellant rather than through a qualified lawyer. Geremia Adriano argued for the review of his conviction under Article 385 of the Penal Code, but the court found the procedural defect fatal. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay court costs and a fine to the State.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 100 c.p.p.; Art. 101 c.p.p.: An appeal in criminal proceedings must be filed by a lawyer; a personal filing renders the appeal inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal appeal personal filing inadmissible appeal court costs qualified lawyer ungesetzliche Ausreise Wegweisung trotz Gesundheitsproblemen Entweichenlassen von Gefangenen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 100 c.p.p.
Art. 101 c.p.p.
art. 385 c.p
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 35929/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for vague criticism lacking connection to the appealed judgment's factual findings.
Ordinanza — n. 34106/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to manifestly unfounded criticism of sentencing logic.
Ordinanza — n. 29823/2025 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for generic grounds regarding recidivism exclusion failure.
Ordinanza — n. 33141/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of specific reasoning on generic mitigating circumstances.
Ordinanza — n. 33837/2022 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for evasion of home detention as generic and legally unfounded.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

nato a SAN SEVERO il 28/02/1995 avverso la sentenza del 08/07/2025 del TRIBUNALE di FOGGIA udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 32670/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 385 c.p.); Esaminato il ricorso proposto da Geremia Adriano; Ritenuto il ricorso inammissibile, essendo stato proposto personalmente dalla parte, con conseguente condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q P.Q.M