Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 18261/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Cassation appeal dismissed as generic; no specific facts or legal arguments were presented by the appellant.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 18261/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible without examining the merits of the conviction for the crime in question. The appellant, Vincenzo Sorrenti, failed to provide any specific facts or legal arguments to support his challenge against the second-instance judgment. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was entirely generic and dismissed it, ordering the appellant to pay procedural costs and a fine.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 367 c.p.p.; Art. 368 c.p.p.: An appeal to the Court of Cassation is inadmissible if it is entirely generic and lacks any specific factual or legal grounds.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inadmissible appeal generic appeal Court of Cassation procedural dismissal lack of specific facts Straftaten gegen die öffentliche Gewalt Gefährdung der öffentlichen Ordnung Gewaltdelikte

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 367 c.p.p.
Art. 368 c.p.p.
art. 337 c.p
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 50549/2023 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic and fails to confront the lower court's reasoning on criminal liability.
Ordinanza — n. 21228/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic complaints fail to rebut appellate court's factual findings on criminal liability.
Ordinanza — n. 30826/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible for being generic and seeking prohibited factual re-evaluation.
Ordinanza — n. 14640/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to repetitive grievances and lack of specific argumentation regarding sentencing.
Ordinanza — n. 33002/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic and repetitive regarding criminal liability judgment.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

ZO nato a CANOSA DI PUGLIA il 14/09/1988 avverso la sentenza del 26/05/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di BARI dato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI;R.G. n. 32459/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il delitto di cui all'art. 337 c.p.); Esaminato il motivo del ricorso proposto da Sorrenti Vincenzo; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché del tutto generico, non essendo stato dedotto alcunchè; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inamm P.Q.M21 2026 rortA Ciodititif-10 De Sanas