Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 5255/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Italian court dismisses appeal as generic and assertive, ordering costs and fine payment.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 5255/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal filed by Ansar Youssef inadmissible due to its generic and purely assertive nature. The appellant challenged a second-instance judgment from Venice, but the court found the grounds lacked specific factual or legal arguments. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a €3,000 fine to the penalty fund.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 366 c.p.c.; Art. 367 c.p.c.: An appeal is inadmissible if formulated in generic and purely assertive terms lacking specific grounds.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inadmissible appeal generic grounds purely assertive procedural costs penalty fund fine Asylgesuch eines äthiopischen Staatsangehörigen anfechtbarer Zwischenentscheid Asylgesuch einer syrischen Familie

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 366 c.p.c.
Art. 367 c.p.c.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 27852/2022 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal on recidivism and excessive penalty grounds as manifestly unfounded.
Ordinanza — n. 49542/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible because appellant failed to raise liability and mitigation arguments in appeal.
Ordinanza — n. 1314/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal as inadmissible because it was directly filed without prior lower court review.
Ordinanza — n. 45394/2024 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal against second-instance plea bargain regarding waived non-prosecution grounds.
Ordinanza — n. 4405/2024 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as arguments merely reproduce merits already decided correctly.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: ANSAR YOUSSEF nato il 09/09/1999 avverso la sentenza del 03/02/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di VENEZIAdato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere MASSIMO RICCIARELLI; visti gli atti e la sentenza impugnata; esaminati i motivi di ricorso, OSSERVA Ritenuto che il motivo di ricorso è formulato in termini generici e nneramente assertivi; Ritenuto dunque che il ricorso è inammissibile, conseguendone la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e, in ragione dei sottesi profili di colpa, a quello della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende, P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 24 ottobre 2025 Il Cgnsiglire estensore Presidente