Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 2970/2026 — snpen KI-generiert

Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of standing or procedural defect under Italian Code of Criminal Procedure.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 2970/2026 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal filed by Pinto Luca inadmissible and ordered him to pay procedural costs. The appellant challenged a second-instance judgment from Rome, but the court found no merit in the grounds raised. Consequently, the appeal was rejected without a merits examination, and the appellant was condemned to pay expenses.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 360 c.p.p.; Art. 600 c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant lacks standing or fails to comply with mandatory procedural requirements, resulting in the dismissal of the request without a substantive review.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal appeal inadmissibility lack of standing procedural defect Code of Criminal Procedure dismissal without merits Recht auf einen Verteidiger Verteidigungskosten Notwehrexzess

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 360 c.p.p.
Art. 600 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 9702/2023 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed for inadmissibility because the petitioner signed documents personally instead of using a qualified defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 28070/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to personal filing in violation of mandatory defense representation rules.
Ordinanza — n. 33036/2025 — snpen
Appeal dismissed because it was filed personally by the accused rather than through a lawyer.
Ordinanza — n. 3497/2024 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to lack of mandatory defense counsel under new procedural law.
Ordinanza — n. 10197/2023 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of qualified defense counsel signature.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: PINTO LUCA nato a FROSINONE il 23/03/1982 avverso la sentenza del 11/02/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 17794/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata; Esaminato il ricorso; rilevato che il ricorso è stato proposto personalmente dall'imputato; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 6 ottobre 2025.