Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of asylum claim due to lack of jurisdictional standing.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, ruling that the lower court correctly rejected the asylum application based on the applicant's lack of proper standing. The applicant argued that the regional authority lacked competence to evaluate the specific grounds of fear, while the state contended that only designated bodies possess this authority. The court upheld the dismissal, affirming that the procedural defect precluded any substantive review of the claim.