Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision to exclude evidence. The appellant argued that the evidence was relevant and necessary for the case, but the lower court had already addressed the procedural requirements for its admission. The court upheld the lower court's ruling, emphasizing that the evidence was inadmissible because the proper procedural channels for its introduction were not followed.