Italian court dismisses asylum claim where applicant failed to prove non-refoulement risk under Art. 3 ECHR.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the asylum application filed by the applicant, who alleged persecution in their home country. The applicant argued that returning would expose them to severe human rights violations, but the court found no credible evidence supporting these claims. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirements for granting asylum were not met due to the lack of substantiated proof of danger.