Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion.

The Supreme Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against the lower court's decision. The appellant argued that certain evidence should have been admitted despite procedural hurdles, while the opposing party maintained strict adherence to procedural rules. The court ruled that the evidence was inadmissible because the necessary procedural steps were not exhausted prior to the trial.