Cassation court dismisses appeal regarding inadmissibility of evidence due to lack of procedural exhaustion requirements.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal lodged by the appellant against the lower court's ruling on evidence admissibility. The appellant argued that certain documentary evidence should have been excluded because it was not properly served or authenticated according to strict procedural timelines. The court rejected this claim, holding that the lower court correctly applied the rules requiring prior exhaustion of specific administrative remedies before evidence could be challenged in this manner.