Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 36507/2025 — snpen KI-generiert

Italian court dismisses appeal on sentence length as it violates agreed sentencing procedure rules.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 36507/2025 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal regarding the sentence's length inadmissible. The appellant, Raffaele Dice', argued for a reduction in the penalty, but the court found the request violated the agreed sentencing procedure. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay procedural costs and a fine.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 111 c.p.p.; Art. 112 c.p.p.: An appeal challenging the length of a sentence is inadmissible if it is not filed in accordance with the agreed sentencing procedure.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inadmissible appeal agreed sentencing procedure sentence length reduction procedural violation Corte di Cassazione penal procedure costs and fine Strafanpassung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 111 c.p.p.
Art. 112 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 30574/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeals against second-instance settlement agreements as legally inadmissible due to preclusive effects.
Ordinanza — n. 20354/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal against plea bargain sentencing due to inadmissible lack of specific legal qualification error.
Ordinanza — n. 22256/2026 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal against penalty reduction in second-instance plea bargain due to lack of illegality claims.
Ordinanza — n. 32883/2024 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal challenging a freely agreed sentence as procedurally inadmissible.
Ordinanza — n. 25674/2026 — snpen
Criminal appeal dismissed as inadmissible due to waiver of issues in settlement agreement.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: DICE' RAFFAELE nato a SANTERAMO IN COLLE il 20/04/1962 avverso la sentenza del 11/03/2025 della CORTE APPELLO SEZ.DIST. di TARANTOudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere ANGELO CAPOZZI; f 18538/25- DE PLANO OSSERVA Ritenuto che il ricorso sull'entità della pena è proposto per ragioni non consentite dal rito concordato sulla pena; Rilevato, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 24.10.20