Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 33036/2025 — snpen KI-generiert

Appeal dismissed because it was filed personally by the accused rather than through a lawyer.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 33036/2025 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassazione declared the appeal inadmissible and ordered the appellant to pay court costs and a fine. The appellant, a private individual, filed the appeal personally without legal representation, violating procedural requirements. The court ruled that appeals in such proceedings must be submitted by a qualified lawyer, rendering the personal filing invalid.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 100 c.p.p.; Art. 101 c.p.p.: Appeals in criminal proceedings must be filed by a lawyer; personal filing by the accused renders the appeal inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal appeal procedure personal filing inadmissible mandatory legal representation court costs and fine procedural requirement violation ungenügende Rechtsschrift Recht auf einen Verteidiger subjektive Postulationsfähigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 100 c.p.p.
Art. 101 c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 24187/2024 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of signature by a registered defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 10197/2023 — snpen
Italian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to lack of qualified defense counsel signature.
Ordinanza — n. 28891/2023 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal as inadmissible due to failure to engage a qualified defense lawyer.
Ordinanza — n. 5710/2023 — snpen
Cassation appeal dismissed for inadmissibility due to lack of signature by a registered Cassation defense attorney.
Ordinanza — n. 22135/2026 — snpen
Italian court dismisses appeal for inadmissibility due to lack of special bar association defense representation.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: MALTA FABRIZIO nato a ROMA il 26/06/1978 avverso la sentenza del 24/10/2024 della CORTE APPELLO di ROMAudita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 9823/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata; Esaminato il motivo di ricorso; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché proposto personalmente dall'imputato; Ritenuto, pertanto, che il ricorso deve essere dichiarato inammissibile, con la condanna del ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 20 giugno 2025.