Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
Ordinanza — n. 32981/2025 — snpen KI-generiert

Cassation court dismisses appeal for generic lack of specific facts regarding liability judgment.

Geschäftsnummer Ordinanza — n. 32981/2025 — snpen
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Italien (IT)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible due to its generic nature and lack of specific factual arguments. The appellant challenged a lower court's conviction for resisting a public official, but failed to provide concrete details on the liability judgment. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal and ordered the appellant to pay procedural costs and a fine.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Art. 363-bis c.p.p.; Art. 363-ter c.p.p.: An appeal is inadmissible if it is entirely generic and fails to deduce any specific facts or legal grounds supporting the claim.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
inadmissible appeal generic grounds resisting public official lack of specific facts procedural dismissal Straftaten gegen die öffentliche Gewalt Angriff auf Leib und Leben staatliche Gewalt

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Art. 363-bis c.p.p.
Art. 363-ter c.p.p.
KI-generiert
Ordinanza — n. 23087/2025 — snpen
Italian Court dismisses appeal as generic and repetitive, rejecting arguments on resistance and intent.
Ordinanza — n. 39200/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as generic and non-comparable to lower court's detailed reasoning.
Ordinanza — n. 19254/2024 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal against criminal conviction for resisting arrest as grounds are unfounded.
Ordinanza — n. 21405/2025 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as it exceeds jurisdictional limits and re-evaluates evidence.
Ordinanza — n. 46558/2023 — snpen
Cassation court dismisses appeal as inadmissible for reiterating facts and proposing an unsupported alternative factual reconstruction.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

a seguente ORDINANZA sul ricorso proposto da: SABOU STEFAN MIHAI nato a NEGRESTI( ROMANIA) il 24/04/1988 avverso la sentenza del 07/01/2025 della CORTE APPELLO di TORINOdato avviso alle parti; udita la relazione svolta dal Consigliere PIETRO SILVESTRI; R.G. n. 8642/2025 CONSIDERATO IN FATTO E IN DIRITTO Visti gli atti, la sentenza impugnata (condanna per il reato di resistenza a pubblico ufficiale); Esaminato il motivo di ricorso, relativo al giudizio di responsabilità; Ritenuto il motivo inammissibile perché del tutto generico, non essendo stato dedotto alcunchè; P. Q. M. Dichiara inammissibile il ricorso e condanna il ricorrente al pagamento delle spese processuali e della somma di euro tremila in favore della Cassa delle ammende. Così deciso il 6 giugno 2025.