Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
TT:2015-33 KI-generiert

Union appeal dismissed; court rejects claim that employer must provide alternative work for union member on strike.

Geschäftsnummer TT:2015-33
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Labour Court dismissed the union's appeal against the termination of a member who was on strike. The employer argued that the employee's strike action constituted a valid reason for dismissal under collective agreement rules, while the union contended that the employee was entitled to alternative work. The court ruled that the employer was not obligated to provide alternative work to a striking employee and upheld the termination as lawful under the relevant collective agreement. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, confirming the employer's right to dismiss the employee for strike participation.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act; Section 10 of the Collective Agreement for the Transport and Logistics Sector: An employer is not required to provide alternative work to an employee participating in a strike, and dismissal for such participation is permissible under the collective agreement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
collective agreement strike participation alternative work termination of employment labour court appeal Arbeitsausfall Einstellung der Unfallversicherungsleistungen selbstverschuldete Arbeitslosigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 1 of the Collective Agreements Act
Section 10 of the Collective Agreement for the Transport and Logistics Sector
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kanteen peruutus.

KANTAJA

Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry

VASTAAJA

Loviisan Ahtaus Oy