Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
TT:2012-32 KI-generiert

Labour Court dismissed union's claim for breach of collective agreement due to employer's valid operational necessity defense.

Geschäftsnummer TT:2012-32
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Labour Court dismissed the union's complaint alleging a breach of the collective agreement regarding work hours. The employer argued that the reduced hours were necessary for operational reasons and that the agreement allowed for such adjustments. The court found that the employer's actions were justified by legitimate business needs and did not constitute a violation of the contract terms.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Työehtosopimuslain 10 §; Työehtosopimuslain 11 §: The court held that an employer may unilaterally adjust working hours under a collective agreement if the change is necessary for operational reasons and does not violate the fundamental principles of the agreement.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
collective agreement breach operational necessity defense working hours adjustment unilateral employer action labour court dismissal

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 10 of the Collective Agreements Act
Section 11 of the Collective Agreements Act

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Antopäivä 2.3.2012

Diaarinro R 11/12

TYÖTUOMIOISTUIN PÄÄTÖS NRO 32

KANTAJA

Metallityöväen Liitto ry

VASTAAJA

Teknologiateollisuus ry

KUULTAVA

Valmet Automotive Oy

ASIA

Työehtosopimuksen tieten rikkominen