Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 483/2026 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows claim for work stoppage due to pandemic restrictions under Labor Code Section 12.2.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 483/2026
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the employee's claim regarding work stoppage caused by pandemic-related restrictions. The employee argued that the school guidance officer's duties were prevented from being performed under Section 12.2 of the Labor Code due to the coronavirus pandemic. The court ruled that the specific restrictions justified a temporary suspension of work obligations under the cited statutory provision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 12.2 of the Labor Code; Section 12.2 of the Labor Code: Work obligations may be suspended if the employee's ability to perform duties is prevented by force majeure or other extraordinary circumstances, such as pandemic-related restrictions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Labor Code Section 12.2 work stoppage coronavirus pandemic school guidance officer force majeure employee rights temporary suspension unentgeltliche Tätigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 12.2 of the Labor Code

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:2026:49
Supreme Court allows employee's full pay claim during pandemic school closure, rejecting employer's suspension argument.
KI-generiert
kko-other_2026_482
Supreme Court rules that pandemic-related school restrictions prevented the teacher's work under the Labor Code.
kko-other_2026_481
Supreme Court dismisses claim that pandemic restrictions prevented work under Labor Code Section 12.2.
kko-other_2026_484
Supreme Court held that pandemic-related school closure restrictions did not prevent the teacher's work under the Labor Code.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2026:49
Supreme Court allows employee's full pay claim during pandemic school closure, rejecting employer's suspension argument.
labour_2003_52
Court dismisses union claim that summer breaks constitute dismissal under collective agreement rules.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, oliko koulunkäynninohjaajan työnteko koronaviruspandemiasta

johtuneiden rajoitustoimien vuoksi estynyt työsopimuslain 2 luvun 12 §:n 2

momentissa tarkoitetulla tavalla. Ks. KKO:2026:49