Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 335/2026 KI-generiert

Supreme Court remands sale auction case for failure to notify buyer of appeal hearing opportunity.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 335/2026
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Court of First Instance dismissed the auctioneering authority's decision to sell shares because the highest bid was below market value, but failed to schedule a hearing for the buyer. The Supreme Court held that the lower court erred by not granting the buyer an opportunity to be heard regarding the appeal. Consequently, the case was remanded to the Court of First Instance for reconsideration with proper procedural safeguards.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Ulosottolaki 1001/1971; Ulosottolaitos 1002/1971: The court must ensure the interested party has an opportunity to be heard when reviewing an auction decision, and failure to do so requires remand.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
auction sale procedure opportunity to be heard market value assessment remand for retrial auctioneering authority decision übersetzter Preis fehlerhafte Anlage Preisbindung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Ulosottolaki 1001/1971
Ulosottolaitos 1002/1971

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO 2005:32
Supreme Court rules that the purchaser at a forced auction is the proper opposing party entitled to reply to the owners' appeal.
KI-generiert
kko-other_2018_2306
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's award of price reduction and damages for construction defects.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:20
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when defendant's personal presence is required for appeal hearing. Appeal dismissed due to procedural error in handling defendant's absence.
kko-precedent_2005_32
Supreme Court rules that the purchaser at a forced auction is the proper opposing party entitled to reply to the owners' appeal.
appeal_1982_kouvola__1987
Appeal court revoked free trial right due to lack of need and ability to pay costs.
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__2005
Appeal court dismissed request for sale and disposal ban due to lack of probable cause and risk of asset concealment.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Hovioikeus oli ulosottovelallisen valituksesta kumonnut asunto-osakkeiden myyntiä

koskevan Ulosottolaitoksen päätöksen katsoen kihlakunnanvoudin hyväksymän

korkeimman tarjouksen alittaneen selvästi käyvän hinnan paikkakunnalla.

Hovioikeus ei ollut varannut asunto-osakkeiden ostajalle tilaisuutta tulla

valituksen johdosta kuulluksi.

Korkein oikeus katsoi, että hovioikeus oli menetellyt virheellisesti, kun se ei

ollut varannut ostajalle tilaisuutta tulla kuulluksi. Asia palautettiin

hovioikeuteen uudelleen käsiteltäväksi. Ks. KKO 2005:32