Supreme Court held that foreign building occupancy rights can be terminated if the owner fails to pay rent.

The Supreme Court ruled that the tenant's right to occupy a building in another country could be terminated due to non-payment of rent. The tenant argued for continued occupancy based on the statutory right, while the landlord contended that the contractual obligation to pay rent was the primary condition for maintaining the tenancy. The court decided that the failure to fulfill the payment obligation justified the termination of the occupancy right under the relevant property law provisions.