Supreme Court dismisses claim that shoulder nerve damage is probable cause of work injury.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the claim that the applicant's shoulder nerve damage was a probable cause of a work injury. The applicant argued the injury occurred during work duties, while the opposing party contended the medical evidence did not establish a causal link. The court ruled that the available medical documentation failed to prove the necessary probable causal connection required by law.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertWork Injury Act s. 10; Work Injury Act s. 11: The court held that a claim for work injury compensation requires proof of a probable causal connection between the work activity and the injury, which was not established in this case due to insufficient medical evidence.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys siitä, onko A:lla todettu hartiaseudun hermopunoksen vaurio todennäköisessä lääketieteellisessä syy-yhteydessä A:lle sattuneeseen työtapaturmaan.