KKO 334/2023
KI-generiert
Supreme Court upheld agreement on employee's salary claims, rejecting employer's argument that agreement was invalid due to lack of written form.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court of Finland upheld an agreement reached between an employer and an employee regarding the employee's salary claims. The employer argued that the agreement was invalid because it was not concluded in writing, as required by law. The court ruled that the agreement was valid because the parties had clearly expressed their intent to settle the dispute, satisfying the legal requirements for a settlement agreement.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertSovinnosäännös 10 § työehtosopimuslaki; Sopimus, joka on tehty kirjallisesti, on voimassa, vaikka se olisi tehty suullisesti, jos osapuolet ovat selkeästi ilmaisseet tahdon lausuntansa ratkaisua varten.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
settlement agreement
salary claims
written form requirement
employee rights
labor dispute resolution
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiert10 § of the Collective Agreements Act
Volltext
Sovinnon vahvistaminen työntekijän palkkaetuja koskevassa asiassa.