Supreme Court allows child visitation enforcement when parental cooperation is absent and child's best interests are served.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court granted the application for a continuation of the visitation permission process. The applicant sought enforcement of child visitation rights while the other parent refused cooperation, arguing that the child's well-being was compromised by the lack of contact. The court ruled that in the absence of parental cooperation, the judicial authority must actively facilitate visitation to ensure the child's best interests are met.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki lapsen oikeudesta (1996:381), 10 §; Laki perheestä (1996:381), 10 §: When a parent refuses to cooperate with visitation arrangements, the court must actively facilitate contact to uphold the child's best interests.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä lapsen tapaamisoikeuden täytäntöönpanoa koskevassa asiassa.