Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1167/2023 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows partial costs award where lower court failed to address initial trial expenses.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1167/2023
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeal's decision to award legal costs only for the appellate proceedings, rejecting the appellant's claim for costs from the original trial. The appellant had won the appeal but failed to substantiate a request for reimbursement of expenses incurred during the first instance before the District Court. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court correctly limited the cost liability to the appellate stage due to the missing procedural request.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 26 of the Costs Act 1958; Section 27 of the Costs Act 1958: A party is only liable to pay legal costs for proceedings in which they have actually participated and for which they have made a specific request.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
legal costs appellate proceedings first instance costs claim procedural request Supreme Court liability fehlende Anspruchsberechtigung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 26 of the Costs Act 1958
Section 27 of the Costs Act 1958
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-other_2022_365
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding legal costs for granting further stay of execution permission.
kko-precedent_2011_55
Supreme Court allows appeal to complete criminal trial judgment regarding unaddressed civil costs claim.
kko-precedent_2013_44
Supreme Court allows appeal on costs in family case without further handling permission as it falls under application proceedings.
kko-precedent_1998_29
Supreme Court allows appeal against arbitration award costs when opposing party was not a true adversary in lower court.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

A Oy oli hovioikeudessa vaatinut, että käräjäoikeuden tuomio kumotaan ja että B velvoitetaan korvaamaan A Oy:n asianosais- ja oikeudenkäyntikulut korkoineen. A Oy voitti muutoksenhakunsa hovioikeudessa. Hovioikeus katsoi, että A Oy ei ollut esittänyt käräjäoikeuden osalta oikeudenkäyntikuluja koskevaa vaatimusta, ja velvoitti B:n korvaamaan A Oy:n oikeudenkäyntikulut vain hovioikeuden osalta. Kysymys hovioikeuden menettelyn oikeellisuudesta ja oikeudenkäyntikulujen korvausvelvollisuudesta.