Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding oral testimony received at district court not being re-heard at court of appeal.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the lower court's refusal to re-examine oral testimony previously heard at the district court. The appellant argued that the court of appeal had a duty to re-hear such evidence during its main proceedings, while the opposing party contended that the initial hearing was sufficient. The court ruled that the lower court correctly exercised its discretion to rely on the existing record without mandating a new hearing.