KKO 1017/2022
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding state's duty to reimburse legal aid costs to clients' counsel.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the respondent's appeal concerning the obligation to reimburse legal aid costs incurred by the state for the respondent's counsel. The respondent argued that under the Legal Aid Act, the state must recover these expenses from the client's counsel. The court held that the statutory provision does not impose such a reimbursement duty on the state in this context.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLegal Aid Act s. 22; The state is not obligated to reimburse costs paid by the state for the respondent's counsel to the client's counsel under the Legal Aid Act.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
Legal Aid Act
state reimbursement
legal counsel costs
respondent's duty
Supreme Court appeal
Rückforderung des Staates
Kostenrückforderung
Rückabtretung
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLegal Aid Act s. 22
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-other_1997_1297
Creditor in debt restructuring must reimburse state for lawyer fees paid to debtor's counsel upon appeal rejection.
admin_1992_kyme-county__30
Administrative court dismissed unemployment benefit repayment claim but allowed interest due to lack of legal basis for interest.
kko-precedent_2010_24
Supreme Court allows full legal costs to plaintiffs when criminal charge outcome is minor compared to civil victory.
kko-precedent_2009_8
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; defendant not liable for costs without strong reasons despite prior breach.
kko-other_2006_702
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding client's duty to reimburse state for opponent's legal costs under the Legal Aid Act.
Volltext
Kysymys vastaajan velvollisuudesta korvata asianomistajien avustajille hovioikeudessa valtion varoista maksettuja kustannuksia takaisin valtiolle oikeusapulain 22 §:n nojalla.