Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 748/2021 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows bankruptcy petition when court fails to schedule hearing for company representative.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 748/2021
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the bankruptcy petition against a company because the district court failed to schedule a hearing for the company's representative. The company argued that without a proper opportunity to be heard, the petition should not have been granted. The court ruled that the procedural defect in scheduling the hearing justified the granting of the petition to protect creditors' interests.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Ulosottolain 10 luku; Konkurssilain 10 luku: A bankruptcy petition may be granted even if the debtor's representative was not given a hearing, provided the court failed to schedule such a hearing.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
bankruptcy petition hearing opportunity procedural defect creditor protection court scheduling duty Konkursprivileg Konkursaufschub Beeinträchtigung des Wettbewerbs

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Ulosottolaki 10 luku
Konkurssilaki 10 luku
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1997_132
Supreme Court remands case to lower court for review under bankruptcy recovery Act section 10.
appeal_1985_helsinki__785
Court dismisses claimant's right to participate in damages trial after bankruptcy estate decides against proceeding.
kko-precedent_1998_158
Supreme Court dismisses administrator's appeal as court decision did not directly bind him personally.
appeal_1982_eastern-finland__1364
Court dismissed claim for redundancy pay when employer went bankrupt and statutory notice period was only 14 days.
kko-other_2012_872
Supreme Court allows company in bankruptcy to be ordered to pay opponent's court costs from bankruptcy estate.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, olisiko yhtiön konkurssipesälle tullut myöntää jatkokäsittelylupa, kun yhtiö oli ulosottovalitusasian käsittelyn ollessa käräjäoikeudessa vireillä asetettu konkurssiin eikä käräjäoikeus ollut varannut konkurssipesälle tilaisuutta tulla kuulluksi asiassa.