Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 631/2021 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses prosecution for negligence against court officials where prosecution statute of limitations had expired.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 631/2021
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the prosecution against a court clerk, judge, and jurors for negligent breach of official duty. The prosecution was filed after the statute of limitations for criminal proceedings had expired, rendering the case procedurally time-barred. Consequently, the court ruled that no criminal liability could be established due to the lapse of the limitation period.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 10 of the Act on the Statute of Limitations for Criminal Proceedings; the prosecution is inadmissible if the limitation period for criminal proceedings has expired.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
statute of limitations criminal proceedings negligent breach of duty court officials prosecution inadmissibility Zweifel an der Rechtswidrigkeit Unfallkausalität medizinische Gründe

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 10 of the Act on the Statute of Limitations for Criminal Proceedings
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2006_33
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; individual acts are not one crime due to lack of continuous intent.
kko-precedent_2005_19
Civil claim dismissed in criminal proceedings due to procedural rules on incidental civil matters.
kko-other_2019_1430
Supreme Court allows parole application where fraud conviction does not preclude release due to changed circumstances.
kko-precedent_2006_50
Supreme Court dismisses prosecution for negligence when defendant's presence is legally required for trial.
kko-precedent_2008_65
Supreme Court allows prosecution for breach of duty by university professor, splitting timeline based on statute of limitations.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Käräjäsihteeri oli antanut virheellisellä tavalla haasteen tiedoksi rikosasian vastaajalle, ja syyteoikeus oli vanhentunut. Kysymys siitä, olivatko käräjätuomari, käräjäsihteeri ja lautamiehet syyllistyneet tuottamukselliseen virkavelvollisuuden rikkomiseen.