Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 277/2021 KI-generiert

Supreme Court refused ruling on security measure appeal because main case judgment already ordered seizure.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 277/2021
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court declined to issue a ruling on the appeal regarding the security measure because the main damages case had already resulted in a judgment ordering the seizure. The lower court's decision to seize assets was primarily based on this final judgment, rendering the separate security measure appeal moot. Consequently, the court determined that no further ruling was necessary as the underlying legal basis for the seizure was already established.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; When the main case judgment already orders the seizure, the court does not issue a ruling on the appeal regarding the security measure.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
security measure appeal main case judgment seizure order mootness principle Code of Judicial Procedure Recht auf Höherversicherung Schutz wohlerworbener Rechte Anpassung der Versicherungsleistungen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO:1996:122
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against seizure order finalized in main criminal trial judgment.
KI-generiert
kko-other_2000_1350
Supreme Court allows appeal against decision to grant security for spouse's property separation settlement request.
kko-precedent_1996_122
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against seizure order finalized in main criminal trial judgment.
kko-precedent_2001_8
Supreme Court allows appeal against seizure order extension when seizure validity remains unfinally decided.
kko-precedent_2002_22
Supreme Court requires leave to appeal for seizure of property decisions made as first instance.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2020:41
Supreme Court dismisses security claim because plaintiff failed to prove likelihood of obtaining damages from defendant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

B Oy:n hakemuksesta A Oy:n omaisuutta oli määrätty pantavaksi takavarikkoon B Oy:n vahingonkorvaussaamisen turvaamiseksi. Turvaamistoimiasiaa koskevan muutoksenhaun ollessa vireillä Korkeimmassa oikeudessa käräjäoikeus antoi vahingonkorvausasiassa tuomion, jossa määrättiin myös takavarikosta. Koska takavarikko nyttemmin perustui pääasiassa annettuun käräjäoikeuden tuomioon, Korkein oikeus ei antanut lausuntoa turvaamistoimipäätöstä koskevasta muutoksenhakemuksesta. Ks. KKO:1996:122