KKO 184/2021
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where filing deadline was missed but court failed to reject late submission.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court's decision to reject a late-filed appeal. The appellant argued that the district court erred by not accepting the submission before the new deadline expired. The court held that the lower court was obligated to examine the appeal despite the procedural delay.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertKorkein oikeus 1. luvun 100 § ja 101 §:n nojalla: If a court fails to reject an appeal filed after a new deadline, the appeal must be examined rather than dismissed for lateness.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
late appeal filing
procedural deadline
court duty to examine
supreme court review
administrative procedure
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertChapter 1, Section 100 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Chapter 1, Section 101 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Volltext
Valitus oli saapunut käräjäoikeuden kansliaan ennen kuin käräjäoikeuden asettama uusi määräaika oli päättynyt. Hovioikeuden ei olisi tullut jättää valitusta myöhään saapuneena tutkimatta.