Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 939/2020 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal for retrial when lower court wrongly denies it in criminal case.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 939/2020
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court granted the applicant's request for a retrial after the Court of Appeal incorrectly refused it. The lower court had convicted the defendant of assault based on the prosecutor's claim, but failed to properly consider the applicant's grounds for a new trial. The court ruled that the refusal violated the applicant's right to have their appeal fully examined, necessitating a retrial.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 a §; Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 b §: The Supreme Court must grant a retrial when a lower court improperly denies an applicant's request for a new trial without sufficient justification.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
criminal procedure retrial request Court of Appeal procedural error appeal rights Supreme Court conviction privilegierter Tatbestand

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 a §
Korkein oikeus 10. luvun 10 b §
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2014_25
Supreme Court quashes lower court verdict due to denial of defense preparation time and lack of legal aid.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__766
Court upheld conviction for aggravated assault, rejecting reformatio in peius request despite new evidence of life-threatening injury.
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__349
Court allows partial sentence reduction to fines when reduction applies to both fines and imprisonment.
appeal_1983_helsinki__1608
Court of Appeal may add qualifying circumstances to a convicted person's decision based solely on their appeal if evidence supports it.
kko-other_2011_1746
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding lower court's duty to transfer robbery case to main hearing.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Käräjäoikeus oli tuominnut vastaajan vammantuottamuksesta syyttäjän ajaman pahoinpitelyä koskevan rangaistusvaatimuksen perusteella. Kysymys siitä, olisiko hovioikeuden tullut myöntää muutosta hakeneelle vastaajalle jatkokäsittelylupa.