Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 851/2020 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal when electronic system records longer sentence than court judgment.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 851/2020
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal regarding the discrepancy between the court's judgment and the electronic system's record. The lower court sentenced the defendant to nine months imprisonment, but the digital system erroneously recorded eleven months. The Court held that the official judgment prevails over the system error, and the appeal must be based on the correct nine-month term.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 1000.10 of the Code of Judicial Administration; s. 1000.11 of the Code of Judicial Administration: The official court judgment determines the sentence, and errors in the electronic system do not alter the legal outcome of the appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
electronic sentencing system judgment record discrepancy appeal procedure imprisonment term data entry error systemische Schwachstellen Verfahrensmangel Irreführung der Rechtspflege

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 1000.10 of the Code of Judicial Administration
s. 1000.11 of the Code of Judicial Administration
KI-generiert
appeal_1981_eastern-finland__349
Court allows partial sentence reduction to fines when reduction applies to both fines and imprisonment.
appeal_1983_helsinki__1810
Court upheld detention for recidivist sentenced to over one year under RVA 30a § 2.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2022:43
Supreme Court allows extending a suspended sentence when prior total sentences cannot reduce it under the law.
kko-other_2014_1416
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where prior sentence was conditional, negating its role as a mitigating factor for new crime.
appeal_1979_eastern-finland__1986
Court of Appeal reduced sentence to probation and added fine despite Supreme Court's prior conviction.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Käräjäoikeuden kansliasta asianosaisille oli annettu tuomio, jonka mukaan vastaajalle oli tuomittu rangaistukseksi 9 kuukautta vankeutta. Vain vastaaja oli valittanut tuomiosta hovioikeuteen. Sähköiseen rikostuomiojärjestelmään käräjäoikeuden tuomitsemaksi seuraamukseksi oli tallennettu 11 kuukautta vankeutta. Hovioikeus pysytti käräjäoikeuden tuomion lopputuloksen sellaisena kuin se oli tallennettuna tuomiojärjestelmään. Kysymys A:lle tuomitun vankeusrangaistuksen pituudesta.