Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1567/2020 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismissed appeal regarding apartment company resolution invalidity affecting continued residence permit conditions.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1567/2020
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the validity of an apartment company's resolution concerning the applicant's continued residence permit. The applicant argued the resolution was flawed, but the court found no grounds to overturn the decision based on the presented facts. Consequently, the resolution remained valid, and the conditions for the residence permit were upheld as legally sound.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki asuinpaikan muuttamisesta (1069/1991); Laki ulkomaalaisten asuminen (404/1994): The court held that an apartment company's resolution regarding residence permit conditions is valid unless proven legally flawed, and procedural errors do not automatically invalidate the decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
residence permit conditions apartment company resolution procedural validity continued residence administrative appeal fehlende Aktivlegitimation des Aktionärs Klage auf Ausschluss aus der Miteigentümergemeinschaft Pfandausfall

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Laki asuinpaikan muuttamisesta 1069/1991
Laki ulkomaalaisten asuminen 404/1994
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1989_35
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court dismissal, ruling that a new shareholder can challenge a prior unanimous resolution requiring all owners' consent.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2025:26
Supreme Court dismisses challenge to apartment co-op share increase as valid share issuance under Act. Court rules share count increase constitutes issuance. Court rejects procedural defect argument regarding share issuance. Court finds share issuance valid under Act provisions. Court dismisses objection based on lack of specific details. Court upholds share issuance despite missing information. Court concludes share issuance was legally effective. Court rejects challenge to share issuance validity. Court affirms share issuance under Act requirements.
kko-precedent_1988_3
Supreme Court dismisses shareholder suit claiming mandatory repair costs violate company law and create unjust enrichment.
kko-precedent_1991_46
Shareholder meeting resolution invalid for granting disproportionate benefit to majority shareholders at minority expense.
appeal_1984_turku__873
Company meeting decision voided because invitation was sent via door post instead of registered mail as required by articles of association.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys jatkokäsittelyluvan myöntämisen edellytyksistä asunto-osakeyhtiön yhtiökokouksen päätöksen moitetta ynnä muuta koskevassa asiassa.