Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1471/2020 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows transfer to Sweden but rejects condition of returning to Finland for sentence execution.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1471/2020
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's order to transfer the applicant to Sweden for criminal proceedings while rejecting the request to condition the transfer on returning to Finland to serve a potential prison sentence. The applicant argued that returning to Finland was necessary to execute any future sentence, but the court found no legal basis to impose such a condition on the transfer itself. Consequently, the applicant may be transferred to Sweden without the prerequisite of returning to Finland, though they will still be subject to Finnish jurisdiction for the original crime.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

s. 1000 b. 1 l. 1 v. 1998; s. 1000 b. 1 l. 2 v. 1998: The Supreme Court held that a condition requiring the transfer of a person to another state to return to Finland for the execution of a potential prison sentence is not legally permissible under the relevant extradition and judicial cooperation statutes.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
extradition conditions prison sentence execution judicial cooperation transfer of persons criminal proceedings Supreme Court ruling conditional transfer Grundsatz der Nichtzurückweisung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
s. 1000 b. 1 l. 1 v. 1998
s. 1000 b. 1 l. 2 v. 1998
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_1997_149
Supreme Court allows prosecution for pre-extradition crimes when extradition is for sentence execution under Nordic law.
kko-other_2025_976
Supreme Court dismisses extradition request when Finnish citizen voluntarily waives domestic criminal proceedings.
kko-precedent_2010_59
Supreme Court allows secondary charge of fraud in extradition case where primary charge was insufficiently prepared. The court ruled that the secondary charge of fraud was admissible despite the extradition order covering all crimes, as the primary charge did not adequately prepare the defense for the secondary allegations. The decision clarifies that a secondary charge can be examined even if the extradition request covered all crimes, provided the defense was not prejudiced by the initial charge's scope. The court held that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes. The court decided that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes. The court decided that the secondary charge was admissible because the primary charge did not sufficiently prepare the defense for the secondary allegations, despite the extradition order covering all crimes.
kko-other_2016_769
Supreme Court allows surrender refusal based on EU law discretionary grounds regarding child's best interests.
kko-precedent_1991_155
Supreme Court reduced state compensation for wrongful detention in Finland prior to extradition to Norway.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Käräjäoikeus oli määrännyt A:n luovutettavaksi Ruotsiin syytetoimenpiteitä varten. Kysymys käräjäoikeuden antaman muutoksenhakuohjauksen oikeellisuudesta ja siitä, oliko luovuttamisen ehdoksi asetettava luovutettavan palauttaminen Suomeen suorittamaan mahdollisesti tuomittua vapausrangaistusta.