Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 859/2019 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows appeal against appellate court's expanded conviction and increased damages without plaintiff's request.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 859/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the prosecution's appeal against the District Court's judgment, overturning the High Court's decision to expand the conviction and increase damages. Although the plaintiff did not request a change to the District Court's ruling, the High Court had independently broadened the conviction and raised the compensation amount. The Supreme Court determined that the High Court's actions were legally flawed and restored the original compensation level.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Section 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; Section 34 of the Code of Judicial Procedure: An appellate court may not expand the conviction or increase damages without the party's request, and such unauthorized changes must be corrected on appeal.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
appellate procedure unauthorized conviction expansion damages adjustment plaintiff consent judicial review Recht auf Höherversicherung Klageänderung Berichtigung des Entscheids

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Section 33 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Section 34 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
KI-generiert
kko-other_2006_720
Supreme Court dismissed client's claim for increased damages due to changed trial circumstances without prior appeal.
kko-precedent_2008_97
Supreme Court allowed appeal on damages increase after remanding case for retrial, rejecting defendant's reformatio in peius argument.
kko-precedent_2013_71
Supreme Court allows partial criminal dismissal but upholds full civil compensation due to defendant's admission of liability amounts.
kko-precedent_2003_108
Supreme Court held defendant liable for costs despite acquittal due to post-trial lighter law application.
kko-precedent_2013_30
Supreme Court allows appeal for insufficient damages reasoning due to lack of trial court justification.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Syyttäjän haettua muutosta käräjäoikeuden tuomioon hovioikeus oli laajentanut syyksilukemista. Hovioikeus oli tämän johdosta myös korottanut asianomistajalle tuomittua vahingonkorvausta, vaikka asianomistaja ei ollut hakenut muutosta käräjäoikeuden tuomioon. Hovioikeuden tuomitsema vahingonkorvaus alennettiin käräjäoikeuden tuomitsemaan määrään.