Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 681/2019 KI-generiert

Supreme Court allows witness statement as evidence in serious drug offense trial despite procedural objections.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 681/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the witness statement to be considered as evidence in a serious drug offense trial. The prosecution submitted the statement, while the defense argued it should be excluded due to procedural irregularities. The court ruled that the statement met the requirements for admissibility and could be used to establish facts.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Korkein oikeus 1. luvun 10 a § syyteprosessilain (1999) ja 1. luvun 10 § syyteprosessilain (1999): A witness statement submitted by the prosecution may be admitted as evidence in a criminal trial if it satisfies the statutory requirements for admissibility and does not violate the defendant's rights.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
witness statement admissibility serious drug offense procedural irregularities evidence rules Finland criminal trial procedure Pflicht zum persönlichen Erscheinen fehlende Legitimation der Staatsanwaltschaft Öffentlichkeitsgrundsatz

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
1. luvun 10 a § syyteprosessilain (1999)
1. luvun 10 § syyteprosessilain (1999)

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
KKO 2018:54
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, remands case for retrial due to failure to hear victim in criminal trial.
KI-generiert
kko-leave_2025_33
Supreme Court held that the leave-to-appeal certificate description does not bind the court or limit case handling.
kko-precedent_2015_20
Supreme Court allows appeal when lower court uses prior investigation statement as evidence without giving defendant a chance to comment.
kko-other_2002_189
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; oral hearing required when facts are disputed and no prior hearing occurred.
kko-precedent_1991_84
Supreme Court dismisses drug charge evidence due to defendant's right to cross-examine witnesses violation.
kko-other_2013_1023
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding conditions for granting further proceedings permission in assault cases.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Kysymys siitä, onko kanssavastaajan esitutkintakertomus voitu hovioikeudessa ottaa näyttönä huomioon ratkaistaessa törkeää huumausainerikosta koskevaa asiaa. Ks. KKO:2018:54