Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 638/2019 KI-generiert

Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court wrongly denied further proceedings permission due to factual error.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 638/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland dismissed the appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision to deny permission for further proceedings. The lower court incorrectly concluded that the applicant required such permission, a determination based on a factual error regarding the case status. Consequently, the Supreme Court ordered the case to be returned to the Court of Appeal for a correct assessment.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä (1093/1999) 10 §; Laki oikeudenkäyntijärjestystä koskevista yleisistä säännöistä (1093/1999) 11 §: The Court of Appeal's refusal to grant permission for further proceedings is invalid if the refusal was based on a mistaken finding that the applicant required such permission.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
permission for further proceedings Court of Appeal error factual mistake in procedure Supreme Court review case remittal Verfahrensmangel Grundsatz ne bis in idem Parteianhörung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
1093/1999 10 §
1093/1999 11 §
KI-generiert
kko-precedent_2009_29
Supreme Court remands case due to appellate court's failure to request written response on appeal, violating procedural fairness.
kko-other_2008_65
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding High Court's duty to transfer serious theft cases to main court.
kko-precedent_2008_59
Supreme Court quashes appeal court decision for violating oral testimony rules by relying on written statements.
kko-precedent_1993_149
Supreme Court remands case to ensure non-responding party received notice of new appeal deadline.
kko-other_1999_1823
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding payment made after lower court judgment to be considered in final ruling.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Hovioikeus oli virheellisesti katsonut valittajan tarvitsevan asiassa jatkokäsittelyluvan ja jättänyt luvan myöntämättä. Asia palautettiin hovioikeuteen.