KKO 574/2019
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding late telecopied filing, ruling procedural deadline strictness applies to telecopied documents.
Finnland (FI)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning the timeliness of a telecopied filing submitted to the district court. The appellant argued the telecopy arrived within the deadline, while the court found the original paper copy was late. The court held that strict procedural deadlines apply to telecopied submissions unless specific exceptions are met, rendering the appeal inadmissible.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generierts. 100.10 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; telecopied filings must be received by the court within the statutory deadline to be considered timely, and late receipt of the original does not cure the delay.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
telecopied filing
procedural deadline
Code of Judicial Procedure
admissibility of appeal
timeliness requirement
Rechtzeitigkeit der Postaufgabe
verspätete Beweismittel
Mitteilungsfrist
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generierts. 100.10 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Verwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertkko-precedent_1997_78
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where telecopy appeal started after office hours, requiring full document arrival before deadline.
admin_1992_uusimaa-county__161
Administrative court dismissed late appeal filed after office hours via fax under MääräaikaL 6.
kko-precedent_2011_63
Supreme Court allows appeal dismissed for late filing due to court's email server misclassification error.
kko-precedent_2005_3
Supreme Court allows late appeal notice sent via email due to server failure and reliable sending proof.
insurance_1994_6154-1994
Insurance Court dismissed late appeal filed via fax after deadline expired due to technical transmission delay.
Volltext
Kysymys siitä, oliko telekopiona lähetetty valitus saapunut käräjäoikeuden kansliaan määräajassa ja oliko valitus tutkittava.