KKO 310/2019
KI-generiert
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding refusal to appoint a lawyer in a closed case.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to appoint a lawyer for the respondent. The respondent argued that the lack of a lawyer violated their right to defense, while the opposing party contended the case was closed and no legal representation was necessary. The court ruled that since the proceedings had concluded, the appointment of counsel was no longer required.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertLaki oikeusapuudesta 1066/1994; 1067/1994: The court may refuse to appoint a lawyer if the proceedings have already concluded or if the appointment is not necessary for the resolution of the case.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
right to defense
appointment of lawyer
closed case proceedings
legal aid refusal
supreme court appeal
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertLaki oikeusapuudesta 1066/1994
1067/1994
Volltext
Valituksen peruuttamisen johdosta lausunnon antaminen asiassa raukesi.