Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
KKO 1283/2019 KI-generiert

Employee's claim against employer for legal costs in labor dispute was allowed with partial cost reimbursement.

Geschäftsnummer KKO 1283/2019
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Finnland (FI)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Supreme Court of Finland allowed the employee's claim for legal costs against the employer regarding a labor dispute. The case was procedurally unclear under the Code of Judicial Procedure, yet the employer had a justified reason to participate in the proceedings. Consequently, the court ruled that the employer must partially reimburse the employee's legal expenses despite the procedural ambiguity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Code of Judicial Procedure Chapter 21 Section 8a; When a labor dispute case is legally unclear under the Code of Judicial Procedure, the employer must partially reimburse the employee's legal costs if they had a justified reason to participate in the proceedings.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
labor dispute legal costs employee claim employer liability procedural clarity Supreme Court cost reimbursement Lohnanspruch

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
Code of Judicial Procedure Chapter 21 Section 8a
KI-generiert
kko-other_2019_1284
Supreme Court allows employee's claim against employer for legal costs due to procedural uncertainty.
ECLI:FI:KKO:2019:65
Supreme Court allows employee's claim against employer for legal costs where case was legally unclear.
kko-precedent_1998_118
Supreme Court dismisses state's liability for litigation costs when plaintiff sues only state for costs, not main claim.
kko-other_1998_3216
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; state not liable for litigation costs in wage protection case.
labour_1975_69
Employer must pay severance if dismissal lacks valid economic grounds, even if employee misconduct contributed.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Työntekijän työnantajaansa vastaan ajama työsuhdesaatavia koskeva kanne oli hyväksytty. Asia oli oikeudenkäymiskaaren 21 luvun 8 a §:ssä tarkoitetulla tavalla oikeudellisesti niin epäselvä, että työnantajalla oli ollut perusteltu syy oikeudenkäyntiin. Korkein oikeus katsoi ratkaisustaan ilmenevillä perusteilla, että työnantajan tuli kuitenkin korvata työntekijän oikeudenkäyntikulut osittain.

OK 21 luku 8 a §